Are College Elections in Odisha Really Necessary? A Deep Dive into Student Politics, Violence, and Funding

Photo Credit: Vinilaisf via Wikimedia Commons / CC BY-SA 4.0
Student elections have officially returned to campuses across Odisha, reigniting a familiar debate. While supporters argue that college elections act as a crucial training ground for future leaders, recent incidents—ranging from viral videos of lavish feasts like biryani and panipuri to violent clashes, property damage, and outside interference—have raised serious concerns.
With no independent income, where are students getting the funding for high-stakes campaigns? Why are rallies spilling out onto public streets? And most importantly, is it time for the Odisha government to rethink student elections in favor of academic focus?
Why Are College Elections Happening in Odisha Again?
For years, student elections were put on hold across many universities and colleges in Odisha to curb campus violence and political interference. However, their reinstatement has sparked a statewide debate.
The Positive Side: Advocates believe that student politics gives young people a voice, teaches them democratic values, and builds early leadership skills.
The Core Problem: Instead of focusing on academics and career-building, campuses are witnessing intense rivalry, physical altercations, and disruptive behavior. If college principals and institutional authorities are already responsible for solving student grievances, why is a political election necessary in the first place?
The Big Question: Where is the Campaign Funding Coming From?
Recent viral videos from various Odisha colleges show candidates treating supporters to expensive food items like biryani and panipuri, alongside high-end campaign displays.
This raises an alarming question: How are students with no personal source of income funding these expensive campaigns?
Who is financing these young candidates behind the scenes?
Is external political money infiltrating educational institutions?
Parents and citizens are urging the Odisha government and law enforcement to launch a thorough investigation into the financial backing of these campus candidates before things escalate further.
Campus Rules vs. Street Rallies: Who is Actually Voting?
Another baffling trend in this year’s elections is campaigning outside college gates and on public roads.
The Logic Gap: Student elections are meant for enrolled students of that specific institution. Why take the campaign out to the streets where non-students and outsiders get involved?
Public Disruption: Rallies outside campuses disrupt traffic and public peace, raising questions about whether these campaigns are about student welfare or external showmanship.
Furthermore, during these high-voltage campaigns, public and college property is frequently damaged. Who takes responsibility for repairing broken college infrastructure?
Academics vs. Politics: What Should Come First?
College life is meant for building a foundation, studying, and securing a future career. When campuses turn into battlegrounds for student elections, students get caught in the crossfire of political ego clashes.
Risking Young Lives: Viral videos of clashes, beatings, and violence on campuses are terrifying. If a student loses their life or suffers permanent injury during election violence, what happens to their grieving parents?
The Role of the Government: The primary responsibility of the Odisha government is to ensure that colleges have adequate infrastructure, proper facilities, and quality education. Instead of focusing on conducting elections, the government must question why basic campus needs are unmet and whether elections are just a distraction from real administrative failures.
Conclusion: Vote for Solutions, Not Promises
Students must remember that a vote is a powerful tool. Instead of falling for temporary freebies, flashy rallies, or empty promises, the student body should elect leaders who genuinely solve everyday campus problems.
It is time for the Odisha government, educational authorities, and student communities to sit down and evaluate whether these elections foster true leadership or simply put young futures at risk.
